Thirty years ago, the world's first so-called passive house complex was built in Germany as part of an effort to sustainably construct buildings and limit environmental damage.
Dr Wolfgang Feist, founder and leader of the Passive House Institute, developed the idea that, by using the right materials and techniques, buildings could be heated or cooled with minimal need for bought-in energy.
Known in German as ‘passivhaus’, these buildings are warmed from ‘passive’ sources such as the sun, the heat emitted by occupants, or warmth given off by household appliances. With good insulation, in theory, passive houses need never rely on traditional, inefficient and climate-damaging temperature control systems powered by electricity, gas or oil.
Dr Feist’s blueprints were built on five key principles to retain heat energy within the building: high-quality thermal insulation, triple-glazed windows, the avoidance of thermal bridges, an airtight building envelope and a ventilation system that can recover heat. In practice, these principles can ensure generated heat is held within the building for up to two weeks.
Passive houses consume about 90% less heating energy than older buildingsand 75% less energy than the average newly-constructed building, the Institute says. They only need an additional source of heating when the weather is very cold, while in hot summer months air conditioning is unnecessary as insulation keeps the heat out.
As concerns about climate change increase and more people move to urban areas, interest has grown again in Feist’s approach. Buildings certified by the Institute can be seen across continents, from family homes in Japan to the world’s first passive house hospital in Frankfurt, Germany, which is due to be completed later this year.
The upscaleCharlotte of the Upper West Side development, which opened in New York City in 2020, embodies many passivhaus features, so much so that it has been dubbed the “greenest condo in Manhattan”.
As well as the obvious financial savings gained from slashing utility bills, passive houses can more broadly help governments and societies meet emissions-reduction targets, especially in the construction industry. Urban areas remain a major contributor to climate change, according toUnited Nations studies, and the passive house concept has been put forward as a way to meet theWorld Green Building Council’s aim of achieving full carbon neutrality in home buildings by 2050.
Unfortunately, the cost of construction makes passive houses prohibitively expensive for many nations; on top of financial hurdles, there are also the issues of securing planning approvals from officials unused to the concept, sourcing compliant materials and securing the Institute’s certification.
As such, passive housing is, at this point, an unlikely solution torehousing the billion people around the world that the United Nations estimates live in “informal settlements”. The Charlotte may be good for the environment, but each apartment’s multi-million-dollar price tag means it won’t help fill New York City’s desperate need for more social housing.